England is going through the biggest restructuring of local government since 1974. Over the next two years, almost 200 councils will merge, split or move into new regional structures.

This is not a distant or future shift. Local Government Reorganisation (LGR) is already happening now and at scale. Not only that, but it is taking place across services that support some of the most vulnerable people in society.

Councils Have to Keep Services Running

We know that LGR is inevitable, and one of the highest priorities must be that safeguarding cannot fail through the transition.

Councils serve millions of people, and they deserve consistent, reliable care regardless of what happens during reorganisation. That expectation does not change just because structures do. The responsibility to identify risk, respond to concerns, and protect individuals remains constant, even as organisations themselves change shape.

41% of Practitioners Not Confident That Safeguarding Will Be Appropriately Identified During LGR

Our survey showed that 41% of practitioners are not confident that safeguarding concerns will continue to be identified and escalated appropriately during organisational change. This is concerning because it highlights real uncertainty on the front line. When practitioners are unsure whether concerns will be picked up, followed through or owned by the right team, the risk is no longer theoretical. It becomes part of everyday practice, where delays, missed handovers, or unclear accountability can lead to immediate consequences.

This figure should raise concern for anyone responsible for delivering reorganisation. It reflects a lack of confidence in the systems and structures that are supposed to underpin safeguarding in care. At a point when clarity and consistency are essential, many practitioners are expecting disruption.

Safeguarding Cannot Fail During Local Government Reorganisation

Safeguarding is the point where reorganisation either succeeds or fails, and failure is immediate and cannot be undone. Unlike other services, there is no margin for delays or uncertainty. A missed referral, an unallocated case or a delayed assessment is not just an operational issue; it creates direct risk for people who rely on services for their safety and wellbeing. This is why safeguarding cannot be treated as just another workstream. It is where the true impact of reorganisation is most visible and most critical.

A group of social workers walking together with a System C character.

As Chris Sweeney, Director of Social Care Practice at System C, put it, “the lights need to stay on.” Safeguarding referrals must reach the right team. Statutory assessments need to happen on time. Providers need to be paid. People who use services cannot be allowed to fall through the gaps in provision because two organisations are unsure which of them now owns a case.

Keeping the lights on means continuity at every stage, from the moment a concern is raised to the point at which support is delivered.

Technology as a Defining Role

Technology will play a defining role in whether LGR is delivered safely. It will decide whether records follow the people they belong to, whether safeguarding referrals are escalated to the right team on day one, whether providers continue to be paid on time, and whether the practitioners delivering services have the information they need to do their jobs. Technology will help to underpin visibility, accountability and continuity at a time when organisational boundaries are shifting.

Next Steps

Preparing for Local Government Reorganisation? Explore our dedicated LGR page to discover how we can support your transition and help you maintain continuity throughout change. If you need personalised support please reach out to your account manager.

Explore our collection of news and blogs to stay up to date with the latest developments across a wide range of care settings.